| 1 |
On Saturday 16 March 2002 23:09, Brent Cook wrote: |
| 2 |
> Do you essentially mean http://www.freshports.org/ with |
| 3 |
> comments? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
that's cool, but imho there should be some way to leverage |
| 6 |
bugs.gentoo.org by integrating both. i think it would be an |
| 7 |
overkill having a separate "ebuild repository", it should rather |
| 8 |
be kept central. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
probably a simple link like |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?component=Ebuilds |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
(add your date constraints) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
would be sufficient if we just agreed on a standardized way how |
| 17 |
ebuild submissions (and error reports) have to be made. this |
| 18 |
could be done by "forcing" a formatted summary field. e.g. for |
| 19 |
ebuild submissions: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
${P} ${DESCRIPTION} |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
this would be suitable for most users (as gentoo mainly targets |
| 24 |
developers/professionals and as the ebuild names are usually |
| 25 |
self-explanatory). disclaimer: i do not know whether forcing |
| 26 |
field formats is possible with bugzilla. a voting feature |
| 27 |
would be nice too. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
rgds |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
dan |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
...::: Daniel Mettler | http://www.numlock.ch :::.... |
Archives