Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:17:08
Message-Id: 530C7B0D.9060203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) by Joshua Kinard
1 On 25/02/14 13:03, Joshua Kinard wrote:
2 > On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
3 >> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
4 >>> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
5 >>> taken into account any concerns, but please check
6 >>> the grammar part. Thanks!
7 >>>
8 >>> - Samuli
9 >> CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away
10 >> if on ARM, so users don't pull their hair out?
11 >>
12 > This might be an x86 and ia64-specific CONFIG_* item:
13 >
14 > Symbol: DMIID [=y]
15 > Type : boolean
16 > Prompt: Export DMI identification via sysfs to userspace
17 > Location:
18 > -> Firmware Drivers
19 > Defined at drivers/firmware/Kconfig:91
20 > Depends on: DMI [=y]
21 >
22 > Symbol: DMI [=y]
23 > Type : boolean
24 > Prompt: Enable DMI scanning
25 > Location:
26 > -> Processor type and features
27 > Defined at arch/x86/Kconfig:748
28 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
29 >
30 > # grep -rIn "config DMI" *
31 > arch/ia64/Kconfig:104:config DMI
32 > arch/x86/Kconfig:748:config DMI
33 > drivers/firmware/Kconfig:91:config DMIID
34 > drivers/firmware/Kconfig:100:config DMI_SYSFS
35 >
36 > So all non-x86/ia64 systems (amd64/x86_64, too??) probably need to ignore
37 > this CONFIG_* item.
38 >
39
40 After more close look, the feature looks more optional than at first
41 sight. I've dropped the entire
42 check from ebuild and leaned the text in the news announcement.
43
44 This should do it...

Attachments

File name MIME type
2014-02-25-udev-upgrade.en.txt text/plain