Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:23
Message-Id: 530C7870.40407@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) by Steev Klimaszewski
1 On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
3 >> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
4 >> taken into account any concerns, but please check
5 >> the grammar part. Thanks!
6 >>
7 >> - Samuli
8 >
9 > CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away
10 > if on ARM, so users don't pull their hair out?
11 >
12
13 This might be an x86 and ia64-specific CONFIG_* item:
14
15 Symbol: DMIID [=y]
16 Type : boolean
17 Prompt: Export DMI identification via sysfs to userspace
18 Location:
19 -> Firmware Drivers
20 Defined at drivers/firmware/Kconfig:91
21 Depends on: DMI [=y]
22
23 Symbol: DMI [=y]
24 Type : boolean
25 Prompt: Enable DMI scanning
26 Location:
27 -> Processor type and features
28 Defined at arch/x86/Kconfig:748
29 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
30
31 # grep -rIn "config DMI" *
32 arch/ia64/Kconfig:104:config DMI
33 arch/x86/Kconfig:748:config DMI
34 drivers/firmware/Kconfig:91:config DMIID
35 drivers/firmware/Kconfig:100:config DMI_SYSFS
36
37 So all non-x86/ia64 systems (amd64/x86_64, too??) probably need to ignore
38 this CONFIG_* item.
39
40 --
41 Joshua Kinard
42 Gentoo/MIPS
43 kumba@g.o
44 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28
45
46 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And
47 our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."
48
49 --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic

Replies