1 |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> That's not viable, mostly because the performance cost of doing so is significantly |
3 |
> time consuming, that it would block `git push` for minutes at a time, and all users |
4 |
> performing pushes would have to wait in a queue for several minutes per push. |
5 |
|
6 |
This doesn't ring intuitively true for me. Maybe you're talking about |
7 |
running a "repoman full" for every committed package; I'm not. The |
8 |
checks Doug describes are all package-local. What makes this process |
9 |
so expensive? |
10 |
|
11 |
Even if it is true, the solution would be akin to more post-push check |
12 |
automation (like some of Michal's work) instead of blocking |
13 |
automation, not just saying "people should verify things before they |
14 |
push". |
15 |
|
16 |
Cheers, |
17 |
|
18 |
Dirkjan |