| 1 |
On 06/08/2016 11:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:07:06 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> There are some of us against GitHub and/or other commercial outfits, so |
| 7 |
>> that's not a problem. We offer some mirrors on GitHub, and some devs |
| 8 |
>> host things on there, but it's nothing officially endorsed or otherwise |
| 9 |
>> required by Gentoo. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> In fact I recently deleted my repos and account over the Code of Conduct |
| 12 |
>> fiasco, but that's a whole 'nother topic. :P |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Do you mean github's Code of Conduct? Looks like I missed some |
| 15 |
> change there. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Best regards, |
| 18 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
Yeah. It's unrelated to this thread, but GitHub's adopted the 'Open Code |
| 21 |
of Conduct' by the TODO group or whatever. They had claimed it was |
| 22 |
solely for their own projects, but there was some drama that came up |
| 23 |
where they deleted peoples' repos, issues, and/or comments over that |
| 24 |
same CoC. Often, it was enforced due to political or personal leanings |
| 25 |
on sensitive subjects that didn't relate to the code at hand. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It may be better to discuss this over IRC or in private e-mail. The tldr |
| 28 |
of it is they'd enforced their CoC despite it being nowhere in their |
| 29 |
official Terms of Service. For some, that is a problem. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
| 33 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 34 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives