| 1 |
>> In short it's something to this effect: |
| 2 |
>> Major == Concept changes |
| 3 |
>> Minor == Structure changes |
| 4 |
>> Patch == Functionality changes |
| 5 |
>> Revision == Fixes |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Doesn't that mean that: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> 2.1 will be the transition to the transition/external API |
| 10 |
>> and the reworking of portage's internal structure. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> would more appropriately be 3.0? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Depends on what you consider a concept change. New ebuild formats |
| 15 |
or situations where the visible portions of portage change |
| 16 |
dramatically so that it become unfamiliar in some way would be |
| 17 |
how I categorize a major number change. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Documentation will start coming out before 2.1 hits the shelves. |
| 20 |
If you care to argue on this any further, please wait until |
| 21 |
then when the details are more available. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
--NJ |
Archives