| 1 |
Nicholas Jones wrote: |
| 2 |
> In short it's something to this effect: |
| 3 |
> Major == Concept changes |
| 4 |
> Minor == Structure changes |
| 5 |
> Patch == Functionality changes |
| 6 |
> Revision == Fixes |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Doesn't that mean that: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> 2.1 will be the transition to the transition/external API |
| 12 |
> and the reworking of portage's internal structure. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
would more appropriately be 3.0? A change to use an external API |
| 15 |
certainly seems a "concept change." The "reworking of portage's |
| 16 |
internal structure" by itself (i.e. without the API change) would seem a |
| 17 |
more appropriate "Minor" version change. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> --NJ |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- Jason Rhinelander |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives