| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> But, honesly, i can not see problem in this. We have similar problem in |
| 3 |
> ARM team, which was fixed by electing new leads by those, who really did |
| 4 |
> most of ARM stuff AND actively responds on e-mails. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Doing this and giving the games team a chance to set its own destiny |
| 7 |
seems like a reasonable first step. This should include their |
| 8 |
considering Michał's proposals and reacting. Then the community can |
| 9 |
gauge whether intervention "from above" is still needed. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Does anybody want to step up as somebody who wants to join the team |
| 12 |
and be the point of contact for anybody else who wants to join in |
| 13 |
(basically an interim lead only for the purpose of organizing a |
| 14 |
meeting and electing a lead including of course all existing team |
| 15 |
members)? Devs can probably add themselves to the alias already, and |
| 16 |
if non-devs want to participate they can reach out to the coordinator |
| 17 |
to be added. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If anybody has an objection to the influx then somebody can deal with |
| 20 |
that (new council if worst comes to worst), but otherwise this should |
| 21 |
give the team a shot in the arm. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I think it is best to just look forward, of course accepting input |
| 24 |
from what was done in the past so as to learn from it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Just my personal suggestion, but unless somebody really objects I |
| 27 |
don't think it needs anybody's blessing. By all means speak up if you |
| 28 |
think it is a terrible idea. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Rich |
Archives