| 1 |
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:37 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:37 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 3 |
> > 1. 'Broken' status was removed, as it is redundant to profile status. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > 2. State names were changed from 'testing' and 'unstable' to 'degraded' |
| 6 |
> > (broken stable tree) and 'testing' (pure ~arch) to avoid confusion. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Back in time there was also the idea to use this file to indicate security |
| 10 |
> support of an arch. The suggestion was to introduce another column, but I |
| 11 |
> found that rather horrible. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So a better idea would be to introduce an additional status "security", |
| 14 |
> designating "stable with security support". |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> (Acts in every other respect exactly like "stable".) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What do you think? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I suppose it'd work for me. I'm not sure if we have any use case for |
| 21 |
having this data machine-readable but I guess there's no harm in it, |
| 22 |
and better add it now than adjust tools later. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Michał Górny |
Archives