| 1 |
Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:37 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> 1. 'Broken' status was removed, as it is redundant to profile status. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> 2. State names were changed from 'testing' and 'unstable' to 'degraded' |
| 6 |
> (broken stable tree) and 'testing' (pure ~arch) to avoid confusion. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Back in time there was also the idea to use this file to indicate security |
| 10 |
support of an arch. The suggestion was to introduce another column, but I |
| 11 |
found that rather horrible. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So a better idea would be to introduce an additional status "security", |
| 14 |
designating "stable with security support". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
(Acts in every other respect exactly like "stable".) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What do you think? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 22 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 24 |
(council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives