| 1 |
XFS yes, but when I switched to the gentoo-kernel suddenly: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
a. I got the time-outs on my NIC (eepro100) back |
| 4 |
[kernel] eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout! |
| 5 |
b. wacom-tablet stops working: |
| 6 |
[kernel] wacom_intuos_irq: received unknown report #1 |
| 7 |
c. My VGA-console gets f#^&-ed up (seems something wrong with the last line |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
--> gives me diagonal up output (remember those 10 print "this is kewl!"; GOTO |
| 10 |
10 times ;-) ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Nice to see ONLY the 1st time around ;-) ! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Joachim pointed me to some changes regards the eepro100 (latest -ac patch) so |
| 15 |
I'm looking into this, but the rest ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
While XFS worked beautifully after applying this patch, my experiences with |
| 18 |
the XFS-sources are WAY better... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Any advice where to start ? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rigo |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Op vrijdag 3 mei 2002 23:14, schreef Jean-Michel Smith: |
| 27 |
> On Friday 03 May 2002 08:20 am, Rigo Ketelings wrote: |
| 28 |
> > I am testing your patch (r1-r2) right now, and the results so far: |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > While patching: |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > the next patch would delete the file |
| 33 |
> > linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r2/kernel/ksyms.c~, which does not exist! Assume -R? |
| 34 |
> > [n] y |
| 35 |
> > patching file linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r1/kernel/ksyms.c~ |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> He forgot to remove his (probably by emacs) created ~ backup file before |
| 38 |
> generating the patch. On a fresh 2.4.19-gentoo-r1 kernel apply the patch |
| 39 |
> and say NO to Assume -R. Then continue on anyway and the rest should work |
| 40 |
> fine. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> I'm using his patch on a 2.4.19-gentoo-r1 kernel and it works wonderfully! |
| 43 |
> :-) |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> Jean. |
| 46 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 47 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 48 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 49 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives