1 |
On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed |
4 |
> from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Removals: |
7 |
> app-editors/vim-qt 20170525-10:36 mgorny 1aff8d7da4e |
8 |
|
9 |
This was announced here in April[1]. As soon as it was announced, Gordon |
10 |
Pettey commented here[2] that upstream was fine. |
11 |
|
12 |
A quick inspection to the $HOMEPAGE seems to point out that, at some |
13 |
point, the bitbucket repository was the main one, and github was a |
14 |
"mirror". But, by looking at the github mirror[3], it looks like |
15 |
upstream has been quite active, just not in bitbucket. |
16 |
|
17 |
The README at github also hints that this is for Vim 8, which seems to |
18 |
be the in-tree version of Vim. |
19 |
|
20 |
The move to github was also mentioned in gentoo bug 607136[4], |
21 |
comment 2. |
22 |
|
23 |
Why was this last-rited with the reasoning of "Doesn't work with any |
24 |
in-tree versions of vim. Inactive upstream.", when upstream seems to be |
25 |
active *and* this was mentioned both on the mailing list and on |
26 |
bugzilla? |
27 |
|
28 |
[1] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149294484724875 |
29 |
[2] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149295586026533&w=2 |
30 |
[3] https://github.com/equalsraf/vim-qt/commits/master |
31 |
[4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607136 |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Nuno Silva |