Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: nunojsilva@×××××××.pt
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:11:06
Message-Id: oggoht$mi9$1@blaine.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2
3 > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
4 > from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC.
5 >
6 > Removals:
7 > app-editors/vim-qt 20170525-10:36 mgorny 1aff8d7da4e
8
9 This was announced here in April[1]. As soon as it was announced, Gordon
10 Pettey commented here[2] that upstream was fine.
11
12 A quick inspection to the $HOMEPAGE seems to point out that, at some
13 point, the bitbucket repository was the main one, and github was a
14 "mirror". But, by looking at the github mirror[3], it looks like
15 upstream has been quite active, just not in bitbucket.
16
17 The README at github also hints that this is for Vim 8, which seems to
18 be the in-tree version of Vim.
19
20 The move to github was also mentioned in gentoo bug 607136[4],
21 comment 2.
22
23 Why was this last-rited with the reasoning of "Doesn't work with any
24 in-tree versions of vim. Inactive upstream.", when upstream seems to be
25 active *and* this was mentioned both on the mailing list and on
26 bugzilla?
27
28 [1] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149294484724875
29 [2] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149295586026533&w=2
30 [3] https://github.com/equalsraf/vim-qt/commits/master
31 [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607136
32
33 --
34 Nuno Silva

Replies