1 |
On pon, 2017-05-29 at 12:10 +0300, nunojsilva@×××××××.pt wrote: |
2 |
> On 2017-05-29, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed |
5 |
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2017-05-28 23:59 UTC. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Removals: |
8 |
> > app-editors/vim-qt 20170525-10:36 mgorny 1aff8d7da4e |
9 |
> |
10 |
> This was announced here in April[1]. As soon as it was announced, Gordon |
11 |
> Pettey commented here[2] that upstream was fine. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> A quick inspection to the $HOMEPAGE seems to point out that, at some |
14 |
> point, the bitbucket repository was the main one, and github was a |
15 |
> "mirror". But, by looking at the github mirror[3], it looks like |
16 |
> upstream has been quite active, just not in bitbucket. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> The README at github also hints that this is for Vim 8, which seems to |
19 |
> be the in-tree version of Vim. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> The move to github was also mentioned in gentoo bug 607136[4], |
22 |
> comment 2. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Why was this last-rited with the reasoning of "Doesn't work with any |
25 |
> in-tree versions of vim. Inactive upstream.", when upstream seems to be |
26 |
> active *and* this was mentioned both on the mailing list and on |
27 |
> bugzilla? |
28 |
|
29 |
Because apparently nobody cared enough to fix the core issue (bump it). |
30 |
If you want it back, you are free to re-add it. |
31 |
|
32 |
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149294484724875 |
33 |
> [2] http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149295586026533&w=2 |
34 |
> [3] https://github.com/equalsraf/vim-qt/commits/master |
35 |
> [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607136 |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Best regards, |
40 |
Michał Górny |