| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 02:23 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as |
| 6 |
> raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
i like having sys-fs / sys-hardware ... having sys-storage just kind of blurs |
| 9 |
the lines ... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > sys-network: or move stuff to net-*? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> You might consider them more critical to get the system up, so more |
| 14 |
> system related? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
nah, most of those packages arent even on a typical machine unless the user |
| 17 |
emerges em :) ... i'd vote for disseminating them into other sys- or net- |
| 18 |
categories |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
netboot-base should go along side baselayout since they serve [pretty much] |
| 21 |
the same function |
| 22 |
-mike |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives