| 1 |
On 16/02/2013 20:18, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to do |
| 3 |
> things badly in the future? :) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly. |
| 6 |
Masking a package will NOT cause it to get unmerged by default. |
| 7 |
The whole line of thought that Rick is bringing here is based on the |
| 8 |
assumption that masked package == removed package, which is false, so |
| 9 |
the whole point is moot. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 13 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives