| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:51 PM Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 12-09-2018 17:46:03 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:11 PM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > With new GCC comes new warnings, and harmless as the vast majority are |
| 6 |
> > they cause the build to break with Werror. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> To illustrate harmless: |
| 9 |
> warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] |
| 10 |
> The warning message already has it in it that it's just a pure guess. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
One that exposed a lot of unintentional fallthoughs which were fixed |
| 13 |
when reporting to upstream. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Once again... we should discuss to leave -Werror when policy of |
| 16 |
upstream to have no warnings and is maintaining that policy properly |
| 17 |
while we at downstream may cooperate and avoid patching upstream but |
| 18 |
discuss issues when found. |
Archives