1 |
On Sunday 05 October 2003 11:06, Kumba wrote: |
2 |
> James Harlow wrote: |
3 |
> > Well, this isn't true, it wouldn't take more than a couple hundred. Of |
4 |
> > course, this would be pretty difficult to sift through by hand... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> A couple hundred? I think that alone justifies my statetment that x86 |
7 |
> is far too diverse to configure via USE Flags. We already have 176 |
8 |
> global useflags (line count in /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc) and 187 |
9 |
> local useflags (line count in /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc). |
10 |
> All these useflags are spread across the ~5000 packages in Portage. |
11 |
> Adding another "couple hundred" specifically for x86 kernels alone is |
12 |
> overkill to the point of using C4 explosive to clear out a yellow jacket |
13 |
> nest in the ground. |
14 |
|
15 |
Did you read my other post? The idea of adding a use flag for every single |
16 |
device is ridiculous. I'm just talking about use flags for classes of |
17 |
hardware. Looking at use.desc, there are already 27 flags related to hardware |
18 |
and 18 flags related to interfaces to that hardware. Here's a list. |
19 |
|
20 |
hardware: 3dfx, 3dnow, acpi, alpha, apm, arm, cdr, dvb, dvd, dvdr, fbcon, |
21 |
joystick, matrox, mips, mmx, nocardbus, pcmcia, pda, pnp, ppc, scanner, |
22 |
sparc, sse, usb, voodoo3, wavelan, x86 |
23 |
|
24 |
interfaces: alsa, arts, dga, directfb, esd, ggi, gphoto2, gpm, jack, ladcca, |
25 |
opengl, oss, ppds, sdl, svga, xinerama, xosd, xv |
26 |
|
27 |
What I'm suggesting (and don't really care if it's implemented) is that the |
28 |
above are combined into common "super" classes and other classes added. |
29 |
|
30 |
Jason |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |