| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:59:49 -0400
|
| 5 |
Dane Smith <c1pher@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Having said that, for those that just use "keys" for e-mails (most of |
| 8 |
> us), it would make more sense to use full blow SSL certs in the long |
| 9 |
> run. (Mathematically, same thing. But a cert needs to be signed by a |
| 10 |
> CA, and we should ideally maintain a Gentoo CA.) I need to get up to |
| 11 |
> speed with the GLEP's pertaining to this. Let's just say I have a |
| 12 |
> fair bit of experience in this field. I may be able to offer some |
| 13 |
> ideas / suggestions. I would very much like to see this happen. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
How about Gentoo Foundation funding devs a full blown X509 client
|
| 16 |
certs?
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- --
|
| 19 |
Best regards,
|
| 20 |
Michał Górny
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk2MqicACgkQnGSe5QXeB7uMJwCfZ2vnDNdN1HyI9Jzcz9ddPnHO
|
| 25 |
EBwAni9LaXlGcyCp8Hj/MtD0VVSdQoRj
|
| 26 |
=dtD+
|
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives