Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dane Smith <c1pher@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:02:56
Message-Id: 4D8C83B5.5040600@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by "Paweł Hajdan
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 03/25/2011 07:55 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
5 > On 3/24/11 10:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
6 >> is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
7 >> Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is
8 >> ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have
9 >> done this already.
10 >
11 > Firstly, I'm excited we're moving towards a signed portage tree.
12 >
13 > We can start with a repoman warning (yellow) and a transition period.
14 >
15 >> when i look at the tree, the signed stats are stupid low:
16 >> $ find *-* -maxdepth 2 -name Manifest | wc -l
17 >> 14438
18 >> $ find *-* -maxdepth 2 -name Manifest -exec grep -l 'BEGIN PGP
19 >> SIGNATURE' {} + | wc -l
20 >> 6032
21 >
22 > If I'm interpreting the data correctly, about 43% of Manifest files are
23 > signed. That's not too bad, I was expecting something more like 5%.
24 >
25 > By the way, is it acceptable to use the same GPG key for e-mail and
26 > signing packages?
27
28 Yes. In fact, I'd recommend it. Saves having to try to keep track of 2
29 keys / dev.
30
31 Having said that, for those that just use "keys" for e-mails (most of
32 us), it would make more sense to use full blow SSL certs in the long run.
33 (Mathematically, same thing. But a cert needs to be signed by a CA, and
34 we should ideally maintain a Gentoo CA.) I need to get up to speed with
35 the GLEP's pertaining to this. Let's just say I have a fair bit of
36 experience in this field. I may be able to offer some ideas /
37 suggestions. I would very much like to see this happen.
38
39 But for the meantime, yes, it's safe.
40
41 - --
42 Dane Smith (c1pher)
43 Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86
44 RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
47 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
48
49 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNjIO0AAoJEEsurZwMLhUxlsIP/2oaWnkWr160fj8027WA3Jbe
50 oI5dXXvZr2RDMxFXKcyx0qiTfVlhVClJIBn8wANf41uKmMh6azIN5Ug4cDk++0ku
51 qYXvIne4W65TCifU44h80AAOEVBLQwN+d2VCeq7/qu6qJp9PT1SIzCaZZCtRAvOK
52 NwH5ZuUTrcewa/SbADIwP2hbQiLs8m241XJNNWGcIgflbO0OhcvUPlLM6/fUS56X
53 364EUGDo/TAAtkrIhWKKD2xsRoPmmO2uE7euPNhI4pFGUbKXVtb5Lb/qY9iLDgYy
54 PciHr2yFwOY1P16hr51Dbo8b5rPAncIHJFBUBHd89OnZHCwkBUP1z7l1J13NfClw
55 /hoYQe0DO/CrWz2pKF4I3pxP1MnULKKB2ib8RFswCJY2mxKvGeGJoQyZpT/GtCGb
56 vN8o20Kd3Ci+CEpeIo3sqxt04kNoMvMLEq9ZJ++a8c0wijX63ChRL5/+qRxzGDtc
57 I9pN34RDuAuUck0Wp+R/TTG4Bjh5ixQkeh199NoqjNLA02rE0QVElm7PlIJxg36/
58 pp101gH68H0t6EGAFrnGHAG6w/8yAz+Mcm+4WLjpDAPSMXYahZXOCKFn9WV0WgBS
59 e0EG2xr8BD7SqUrZRSlxjGsbFVCVaGvS9qFO4e2B4dKPy1mjwcTdBQRGZOfd3kGM
60 WDV73IcPr2K9cQFJD+Te
61 =yiPl
62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Eray Aslan <eras@g.o>