Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Eray Aslan <eras@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 04:32:13
Message-Id: 4D8D6C0D.5070807@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Dane Smith
1 On 2011-03-25 1:59 PM, Dane Smith wrote:
2 > Having said that, for those that just use "keys" for e-mails (most of
3 > us), it would make more sense to use full blow SSL certs in the long run.
4
5 Please no. PKI is a naive design and for all intents and purposes will
6 remain a pipe-dream. All security relationships that is worth anything
7 is bilateral and no trusted third party is willing to accept enough risk
8 to warrent full trust.
9
10 Using public keys for auth is a good security model and the rest of x509
11 certs is just unnecessary overhead. Let's not go there. GPG is good
12 enough.
13 --
14 Eray Aslan
15 Developer, Gentoo Linux eras <at> gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature