| 1 |
Peter Stuge: |
| 2 |
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If a user has i.e. SSL="polarssl" in make.conf and emerges things that |
| 4 |
>> don't have polarssl on their list, then those things won't have SSL |
| 5 |
>> support at all, right? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Wrong; I would expect emerge to throw an error at me and exit, rather |
| 8 |
> than to fail (build the package without respecting my SSL choice) |
| 9 |
> silently. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> what's the difference in using the SSL use expand here, or just |
| 13 |
>> having packages directly IUSE="+ssl gnutls +openssl nss polarssl" |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The way I see it, the difference is that USE=ssl goes away, and |
| 16 |
> that setting SSL could then imply +ssl, and SSL=foossl would |
| 17 |
> correctly fail to build any IUSE=barssl package. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> //Peter |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
On a note: polarssl support is still missing from a lot of packages, so |
| 24 |
if you really do set it as your ssl provider, you WILL have to |
| 25 |
micro-manage stuff. |
Archives