| 1 |
Hi Zac, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Thursday 19 March 2009 19:20:52 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 4 |
> Robert Piasek wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I think it would be also good idea to add policykit support and finally |
| 6 |
> > unmask it. It seems some packages have hardcoded --without-policy-kit / |
| 7 |
> > --without- policykit and some others add policykit to package.use.mask |
| 8 |
> > (btw can it be unmasked by user from portage level??). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> You can unmask the flag globally like this: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> mkdir -p /etc/portage/profile/ |
| 13 |
> echo -policykit >> /etc/portage/profile/use.mask |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Or, you can unmask it for a specific package like this: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> echo gnome-base/gnome-session -policykit >> |
| 18 |
> /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks Zac. I asked, because I couldn't find it in documentation (maybe it's |
| 22 |
just me being lazy and not trying hard enough though). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rob |
Archives