| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Robert Piasek wrote: |
| 5 |
> I think it would be also good idea to add policykit support and finally unmask |
| 6 |
> it. It seems some packages have hardcoded --without-policy-kit / --without- |
| 7 |
> policykit and some others add policykit to package.use.mask (btw can it be |
| 8 |
> unmasked by user from portage level??). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You can unmask the flag globally like this: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
mkdir -p /etc/portage/profile/ |
| 13 |
echo -policykit >> /etc/portage/profile/use.mask |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Or, you can unmask it for a specific package like this: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
echo gnome-base/gnome-session -policykit >> |
| 18 |
/etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Zac |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iEYEARECAAYFAknCmxAACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMQaACgp09qS5b0mnfYKioovsvyb2eS |
| 27 |
wXQAoIAKgSe/YPbGlLPFWvUogws2GOfq |
| 28 |
=5wNe |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives