Archives
Archives
| From: | Dan Nelson <dan.nelson@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] openoffice ebuild (needs maintainer :-) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:46:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1008118025.1491.0.camel@danno.taligentcorporation.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] openoffice ebuild (needs maintainer :-) by Mikael Hallendal |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 09:44, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 2 | > Do you see any difference in speed on your own-build compared to the |
| 3 | > binary release? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Regards, |
| 6 | > Mikael Hallendal |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | I didn't find any load time speed improvements over the binary of 638c |
| 9 | and my compiled 641b. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I haven't used 641b enough to say that the application runs more quickly |
| 12 | for day to day tasks, but then again, i've never been able to overburden |
| 13 | my CPU with the blazing speed with which I type :) |