| 1 |
Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> That's my proposal. The benefits I like to think are obvious. The |
| 4 |
> drawbacks are, as far as I can see, in tree size, which should be |
| 5 |
> minimal. Those concerned about local tree size can exclude it, and for |
| 6 |
> size on the mirrors it's trivial compared to the rest of the tree. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Comments? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
As long as it's outside the "stable" (200x.y) portage profiles i'm fine |
| 11 |
with it for SPARC. I think Ferris was testing paludis so i'm sure he can |
| 12 |
handle it. |
| 13 |
With respect to the "hey support omg!" comments i say stick a big fat |
| 14 |
README about being an experimental profile or something like that and |
| 15 |
that's it. Usually bug reports require "emerge --info" so it'll be easy |
| 16 |
to flag invalid ones anyway. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Gustavo Zacarias |
| 20 |
Gentoo/SPARC monkey |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives