Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:49:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20151118144849.32759.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 | > Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 | > > However, the largest sticking point, even with parallel threads, is that |
| 4 | > > it seems the base ChangeLog generation is incredibly slow. It averages |
| 5 | > > above 350ms per package right now (at 19k packages in a full cycle, it's |
| 6 | > > a long time), but some packages can take up to 5 seconds so far. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Which code is doing this generation? Sorry - ENOOVERVIEW. :\ |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Bump. Does anyone know where I can take a look at this code? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |