Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:01:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20151114170116.11634.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 | > However, the largest sticking point, even with parallel threads, is that |
| 3 | > it seems the base ChangeLog generation is incredibly slow. It averages |
| 4 | > above 350ms per package right now (at 19k packages in a full cycle, it's |
| 5 | > a long time), but some packages can take up to 5 seconds so far. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Which code is doing this generation? Sorry - ENOOVERVIEW. :\ |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Thanks |
| 11 | |
| 12 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |