1 |
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100 |
2 |
Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: |
5 |
> > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 |
7 |
> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > > > /bin/systemctl |
9 |
> > > > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > Here is a prime example of why "vertical integration" should |
12 |
> > > really be called "a horrible mess of tight coupling"... |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > You clearly have failed to realize that d-bus is a now the bus for |
15 |
> > system messaging and is as much part of the system as syslog or |
16 |
> > bash. Probably even more so, for example, in Fedora 17, you'll be |
17 |
> > able to boot without syslog or bash, but you need d-bus. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> IMO a system should *always* be bootable without that "high level" |
20 |
> stuff. And by bootable I mean that you can get a root prompt at |
21 |
> least. |
22 |
|
23 |
And why do you consider D-Bus being high-level? Just because things |
24 |
used to reinvent the wheel before in a much worse fashion? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Best regards, |
28 |
Michał Górny |