| 1 |
* Michał Górny schrieb am 05.01.12 um 09:26 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: |
| 6 |
> > > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 |
| 8 |
> > > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > > /bin/systemctl |
| 10 |
> > > > > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 |
| 11 |
> > > > |
| 12 |
> > > > Here is a prime example of why "vertical integration" should |
| 13 |
> > > > really be called "a horrible mess of tight coupling"... |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > You clearly have failed to realize that d-bus is a now the bus for |
| 16 |
> > > system messaging and is as much part of the system as syslog or |
| 17 |
> > > bash. Probably even more so, for example, in Fedora 17, you'll be |
| 18 |
> > > able to boot without syslog or bash, but you need d-bus. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > IMO a system should *always* be bootable without that "high level" |
| 21 |
> > stuff. And by bootable I mean that you can get a root prompt at |
| 22 |
> > least. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> And why do you consider D-Bus being high-level? Just because things |
| 25 |
> used to reinvent the wheel before in a much worse fashion? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I meant "hight-level" only in a way that it is not really needed to |
| 28 |
boot the very basic things of a system so that I can get a root |
| 29 |
prompt at the console at least. E.g. you do not need dbus to find |
| 30 |
and mount the rootfs, fire a getty and shell. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-Marc |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives