1 |
On 24/03/13 06:30, Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> On 24 March 2013 09:17, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
4 |
>>> Am Samstag, 23. März 2013, 21:40:16 schrieb Markos Chandras: |
5 |
>>>>> Why not officially recommend SystemRescueCD instead? |
6 |
>>>>> |
7 |
>>>> Looks really bad to recommend another installation media (even if it |
8 |
>>>> is based on Gentoo) to people who want |
9 |
>>>> to install our distro. I'd rather Gentoo recommended the live DVDs we |
10 |
>>>> do from time to time than having these autobuilds around |
11 |
>>>> that seem to break far too often. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> Except for the fact that downloading a DVD is slightly different from |
14 |
>>> downloading a CD... |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> Seriously. SystemRescueCD is more or less exactly what we would need. Has |
17 |
>>> anyone ever approached the SystemRescueCD developers? |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I must confess, I have not used the official Gentoo ISOs in ages. I use the |
21 |
>> SystemRescueCD from a USB stick all the time. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Me too. Our minimal CD is too minimal for my tastes (no X, no GUI |
24 |
> browser for documentation), and our DVD too heavy. SystemRescueCD |
25 |
> seems to hit the sweet spot. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Maybe we could do a co-branded edition once in a while? |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
likewise, either sysrescuecd (OR ubuntu's livecd for networkmanager to |
31 |
get ppp0 up and running) |
32 |
|
33 |
i don't mind configuring ppp0 after installation, but during |
34 |
installation it is an major obstacle |
35 |
|
36 |
imho we should contact the sysrescuecd developers and suggest more close |
37 |
cooperation, such that it could be called official install |
38 |
media in gentoo-terms |