Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:15:11
Message-Id: 43D42D85.9090108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion 1/2 by Marius Mauch
1 Marius Mauch wrote:
2 > On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:45:34 -0500
3 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
6 >>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
7 >>>> On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
8 >>>>
9 >>>> - we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds
10 >>>> "debug-build" to FEATURES
11 >>> IMO this is pointless and redundant.
12 >> its purpose is to handle cases where user wants to always have a
13 >> package built in this manner (ferringb mentioned it as a possibility
14 >> and someone else mentioned they would like it)
15 >
16 > I meant the option is redundant if it just triggers a feature setting,
17 > as it's the same as `FEATURES=debug-build emerge foo`
18
19 OK, where's my package.features and packages.cflags files then? I can do
20 what I want through Mike's proposal, which is to build a specific
21 collection of packages with debugging. I also don't need to duplicate
22 the same list of packages in one file with FEATURES=nostrip and in
23 another with debugging CFLAGS.
24
25 Thanks,
26 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies