1 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> posted |
2 |
1150396775.16946.100.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net, excerpted below, on |
3 |
Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:39:35 -0400: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 19:18 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
6 |
>> Hi Kevin, |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> On 6/15/06, Kevin F. Quinn <kevquinn@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
>> > I read the "should" as |
10 |
>> > implying that all new packages must have it, and packages existing |
11 |
>> > before the introduction of metadata should get it as and when |
12 |
>> > maintainer gets around to it (i.e. at least on the next bump). |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Chris's argument was that this doc _requires_ packages to belong to |
15 |
>> herds (specifically, that all packages that are games automatically |
16 |
>> belong to the games herd). The document clearly doesn't support his |
17 |
>> argument. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I said no such thing. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> This is clearly a case of you trying to assume what I'm saying in such a |
22 |
> way that it matches with what you want me to say. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'd take exception to that "clearly", as I don't see that being the case |
25 |
at all, so it's "clearly as mudly", to coin a phrase. <g> |
26 |
|
27 |
> I said that all games in the tree should be in the games herd. We like |
28 |
> it this way. Trying to make it out like I said something that I didn't |
29 |
> does what for you, exactly? |
30 |
|
31 |
To me (and evidently to Stuart H), those say exactly the same thing, that |
32 |
is: |
33 |
|
34 |
Stu H (arguing that this is what you said, but against the viewpoint): |
35 |
>> this doc _requires_ packages to belong to herds (specifically, that |
36 |
>> all packages that are games automatically belong to the games herd). |
37 |
|
38 |
to me is so similar as to be equivalent to: |
39 |
|
40 |
Chris G: |
41 |
> I said that all games in the tree should be in the games herd. |
42 |
|
43 |
It has long been my personal observation that many arguments aren't in |
44 |
fact arguments at all, once the meaning assigned by the different sides to |
45 |
each word is translated. That may or may not be the case here, but it's |
46 |
certainly true that I (and evidently Stu H) see no difference between the |
47 |
the two statements above, while you vehemently argue there IS a |
48 |
difference, and that in fact it's apparently so clear that someone must be |
49 |
deliberately distorting your statement to make it into the other. (OK, |
50 |
that's what I read into "Trying to make it out like I said something I |
51 |
didn't", but to be entirely fair, maybe you mean something different there |
52 |
than the way I read it too?) |
53 |
|
54 |
That being the case, perhaps if you could try to explain what you see as |
55 |
the difference between the two statements, the discussion can progress |
56 |
beyond this point. It does (to me) seem useless to continue, if what |
57 |
appears to be the very basic difference of whether the two above |
58 |
statements are effectively equivalent cannot be resolved. The arguments |
59 |
are just going past each other, since the two sides apparently are arguing |
60 |
different things due to differences in received meanings. |
61 |
|
62 |
(General observation... It generally does little to progress a |
63 |
discussion, and much to heat it up, when someone accuses the other side of |
64 |
deliberate distortion, when it may rather be a basic definitional |
65 |
difference, and therefore not deliberate at all. Even if there's no |
66 |
conceivable way you can see that the opposing viewpoint makes sense, it's |
67 |
generally far more conducive to progress to assume an honest attempt at |
68 |
understanding on the part of the other side, an honest misunderstanding, |
69 |
and try to find the definitional difference, than to heat up the |
70 |
discussion by saying something is clear, when it's obviously not or the |
71 |
statement wouldn't have been made in the first place. That said, both |
72 |
sides continued the discussion past the point where it was obvious this |
73 |
was a sticking point, rather than stopping right there to address it, so |
74 |
both sides are guilty. I just picked this point to step in and ask for the |
75 |
clarification myself, since I honestly don't see the difference in the |
76 |
two statements you say are so different, myself.) |
77 |
|
78 |
-- |
79 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
80 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
81 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
82 |
|
83 |
-- |
84 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |