| 1 |
Probably some misunderstanding from my side. What you mean with "atom" ? |
| 2 |
just "app" in my terms? If no, can you explain? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Basically, I think best case - is when you can specify one of: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
some-cat/app (this MUST be, because we have doubling of names for some pkgs) |
| 7 |
=some-cat/app-1.2.3 (this also MUST be, because of SLOTed pkgs, some |
| 8 |
bugs workaround and so on) |
| 9 |
app (this is not really necessary I guess, I would suggest to not have |
| 10 |
it at all) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Anton Starikov |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Olivier Fisette wrote: |
| 17 |
> I am interested. I you go ahead, I hope you will use the "atom" syntax instead |
| 18 |
> of the "some-cat/app" syntax, however. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> On Thursday, 2 September, 2004 06:49 pm, Anton Starikov wrote: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>>Finally, shell I make a patch for testing with first iteration syntax like: |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>>#cat /etc/portage/packages.env |
| 25 |
>>some-cat/someapp env_file1 env_file2 ... |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>>#ls /etc/portage/env |
| 28 |
>>env_file1 |
| 29 |
>>env_file2 |
| 30 |
>>... |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>>Is somebody interesting? :) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives