1 |
On 08/12/2015 05:59 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
2 |
> hasufell schrieb: |
3 |
>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I |
4 |
>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is |
5 |
>> pretty clear: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1 |
8 |
>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1 |
9 |
>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 |
10 |
>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> As there was no formal call for a vote, I don't think you can take the |
14 |
> number of voiced opinions as an indicator for the support of an option. |
15 |
|
16 |
Uhm, why not? When I ask for "++", then that is a rough call for |
17 |
opinions. If someone doesn't voice his opinion, then it doesn't count, |
18 |
just like in a formal vote. |
19 |
|
20 |
The only argument you can make is that you want a formal vote, because |
21 |
the amount of consensus is not high enough (is it not?). I guess you |
22 |
will have the same people participating who have already voiced their |
23 |
opinion here. |
24 |
|
25 |
As a compromise, I guess we could say that people are allowed to do both |
26 |
(but must do one of them). The additional code that this would impose on |
27 |
parsing tools is minor. |
28 |
|
29 |
So, either: |
30 |
===== |
31 |
app-misc/foo: stabilize and stuff |
32 |
|
33 |
Gentoo-Bug: 333531, 502062, 562062, 502772, 502077 |
34 |
Gentoo-Bug: 502362, 512062 |
35 |
===== |
36 |
|
37 |
Or |
38 |
===== |
39 |
app-misc/foo: stabilize and stuff |
40 |
|
41 |
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 |
42 |
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502062 |
43 |
... |
44 |
===== |
45 |
|
46 |
If people don't want this either, then I'm done with this topic and will |
47 |
do whatever I like, until someone wants to take this the "formal" route. |
48 |
I'm not interested to go there for such a trivial thing. |