| 1 |
hasufell schrieb: |
| 2 |
> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I |
| 3 |
> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is |
| 4 |
> pretty clear: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> reference the bug only in the summary: 1 |
| 7 |
> don't make any of this mandatory: 1 |
| 8 |
> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 |
| 9 |
> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As there was no formal call for a vote, I don't think you can take the |
| 13 |
number of voiced opinions as an indicator for the support of an option. |
| 14 |
After all, if someone's opinion is already sufficiently represented by |
| 15 |
an existing post, that person would not have reason to write to -dev and |
| 16 |
further clutter the discussion. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The only thing you can derive from this counting is that consensus has |
| 19 |
not been reached. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the |
| 22 |
"https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=" optional for Gentoo Bugzilla, |
| 23 |
would be a compromise I can accept. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I would not like having to redundantly give the bug number when I |
| 26 |
already gave the URL. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives