| 1 |
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 17:59:03 |
| 2 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> hasufell schrieb: |
| 5 |
> > So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I |
| 6 |
> > missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is |
| 7 |
> > pretty clear: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > reference the bug only in the summary: 1 |
| 10 |
> > don't make any of this mandatory: 1 |
| 11 |
> > "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 |
| 12 |
> > "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> As there was no formal call for a vote, I don't think you can take the |
| 16 |
> number of voiced opinions as an indicator for the support of an option. |
| 17 |
> After all, if someone's opinion is already sufficiently represented by |
| 18 |
> an existing post, that person would not have reason to write to -dev and |
| 19 |
> further clutter the discussion. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> The only thing you can derive from this counting is that consensus has |
| 22 |
> not been reached. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the |
| 25 |
> "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=" optional for Gentoo Bugzilla, |
| 26 |
> would be a compromise I can accept. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I would not like having to redundantly give the bug number when I |
| 29 |
> already gave the URL. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use the short |
| 32 |
form: |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531 |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Best regards, |
| 40 |
Michał Górny |
| 41 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives