1 |
> > I like the new page, but we've always prided ourselves on the fact that |
2 |
> > we provide our packages pretty much the way the package developers |
3 |
> > intended. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I think Apache's worth making a special case out of. Our user-base is |
6 |
> changing, and is becoming less experienced than the early adopters. |
7 |
> Providing an initial homepage that points them at useful documentation (that |
8 |
> they may not even realise is available to them) would help these new users |
9 |
> find their feet. |
10 |
|
11 |
I just wanted to comment that this thread has generated a lot of "heat", |
12 |
including some quite vitriolic comments. I don't necessarily agree with |
13 |
Stuart's comment (I like the default Apache page because when somebody |
14 |
experienced sees it that person instantly knows what it is), but I very |
15 |
much respect his opinion. Some of the comments seem to be missing that |
16 |
element of respect that I think both our users and our developers are |
17 |
entitled to receive. Moreover, I'm not the apache maintainer (thank |
18 |
goodness), so when i voiced my opinion I expected nothing else except |
19 |
that it would be listened to, judged on its merits (or lack thereof), |
20 |
and either accepted or rejected, which seems to be exactly what has |
21 |
happened with the people who _are_ apache maintainers. As I mentioned, |
22 |
I don't agree w/ the branding decision here, but I'm perfectly willing |
23 |
to accept that I might well be wrong, and even if I weren't, I'm still |
24 |
outvoted. In a community-based distribution it's probably not a good |
25 |
idea to fight for your ideas to the death. If ninety-plus percent of |
26 |
people disagree with you, you might just want to let it go. |
27 |
|
28 |
My unasked-for two cents or so, |
29 |
g2boojum |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Grant Goodyear |
32 |
Gentoo Developer |
33 |
g2boojum@g.o |
34 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
35 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |