| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:20:37 +0100 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:22:55 +0100 expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, |
| 6 |
> >> but I'd be please if in general such things could be done |
| 7 |
> >> anonymous as it is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel |
| 8 |
> >> and userreps are there to be talked to about such things. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Well that's my point. Userrel and userreps have nothing to do with |
| 11 |
> > such things. And although QA and devrel can, in theory, take |
| 12 |
> > action, it isn't happening. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> saw in the full context looks a bit different than what I was |
| 15 |
> expecting, a 2byte change that is more or less a syntax nuance could |
| 16 |
> be as quickly addressed by the reporter than the developer. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
QA is supposed to avoid fixing other people's code where things are |
| 19 |
actively maintained. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 23 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 24 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 25 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives