| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:22:55 +0100 expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, but |
| 4 |
>> I'd be please if in general such things could be done anonymous as it |
| 5 |
>> is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel and userreps are |
| 6 |
>> there to be talked to about such things. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well that's my point. Userrel and userreps have nothing to do with such |
| 9 |
> things. And although QA and devrel can, in theory, take action, it |
| 10 |
> isn't happening. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
saw in the full context looks a bit different than what I was expecting, |
| 14 |
a 2byte change that is more or less a syntax nuance could be as quickly |
| 15 |
addressed by the reporter than the developer. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
lu - that now knows that -* has been deprecated in favour of "" or |
| 18 |
p.mask. (could the repoman be updated to point to a bit of documentation |
| 19 |
about it?) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Luca Barbato |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 26 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives