| 1 |
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:22:55 +0100 expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 2 |
> I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, but |
| 3 |
> I'd be please if in general such things could be done anonymous as it |
| 4 |
> is in some way FUD and might fuel flames...userrel and userreps are |
| 5 |
> there to be talked to about such things. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well that's my point. Userrel and userreps have nothing to do with such |
| 8 |
things. And although QA and devrel can, in theory, take action, it |
| 9 |
isn't happening. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > * The wrong idea of what the user base is |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That this can be fixed in a relatively short time of concentrated |
| 14 |
> working by a single person has been proofed yet. (It has not been me.) |
| 15 |
> Why not just do it? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
All that we'd find out is the kind of user that actively follows |
| 18 |
requests for information and responds to them. Gentoo currently doesn't |
| 19 |
have a way of interacting with all the other users out there... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 23 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 24 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 25 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives