Archives
Archives
| From: | expose@×××××××××××.net | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:27:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200703142322.55912.expose@luftgetrock.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo) by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I cannot agree on the Genstef-thingy, nor can I proof you wrong, but I'd be |
| 4 | please if in general such things could be done anonymous as it is in some way |
| 5 | FUD and might fuel flames...userrel and userreps are there to be talked to |
| 6 | about such things. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > * The wrong idea of what the user base is |
| 9 | That this can be fixed in a relatively short time of concentrated working by a |
| 10 | single person has been proofed yet. (It has not been me.) |
| 11 | Why not just do it? |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems (was: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> |