| 1 |
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2007 schrieb Jurek Bartuszek: |
| 2 |
> > Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > _rc2-rYYYYMMDD |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Portage will update from _rc2 to a version with revision part > 0. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> However, _rc2-rYYYYMMDD-r1 would *not* be valid anymore, and I think |
| 9 |
> it's quite easy to imagine when this additional -r1 would be |
| 10 |
> neccessary. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'd like to refer you that this is kind of 'best-practice' for the tree. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Danny |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 17 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives