Archives
Archives
| From: | Jurek Bartuszek <jurek@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:12:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 462E71E1.7000704@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Danny van Dyk |
||
| 1 | > Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > _rc2-rYYYYMMDD |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Portage will update from _rc2 to a version with revision part > 0. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | However, _rc2-rYYYYMMDD-r1 would *not* be valid anymore, and I think |
| 8 | it's quite easy to imagine when this additional -r1 would be neccessary. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Regards, |
| 11 | Jurek |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |