| 1 |
Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "broken" in the first paragraph nor how |
| 3 |
> a check can help with unmaintained (=no commits, no?) packages, but if a |
| 4 |
> repoman check will hasten package porting while smoothing the users' ride, |
| 5 |
> I'm personally all for it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
By "broken" I mean unported. In other words, directly depending on |
| 8 |
either virtual/x11 or x11-base/xorg-x11. The check will help discover |
| 9 |
unmaintained packages by not allowing people to do flyby fixes without |
| 10 |
also fixing this. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What can I do to speed up the process of getting this into a 2.1 |
| 13 |
release? Keep in mind my python is beyond bad. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thanks, |
| 16 |
Donnie |
Archives