| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
200605171711.10418.pauldv@g.o, excerpted below, on Wed, 17 May |
| 3 |
2006 17:11:04 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Let's make clear why I put this in. Basically I am of the opinion that |
| 6 |
> until a decision is made to make (in this case) paludis the primary |
| 7 |
> package manager, all official packages should work with portage. Package |
| 8 |
> masked packages are not considered official. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Wasn't it stated that the mechanism paludis uses to hide ebuilds that |
| 11 |
won't work in portage from portage is to mask them to it? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
IOW, this is already the way it is being handled. If masked packages |
| 14 |
aren't official, and ebuilds that require features only in paludis are |
| 15 |
masked as far as portage is concerned, then that checkbox can be checked |
| 16 |
off. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 20 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 21 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives