| 1 |
Thomas Flavel wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:11PM -0700, Pete Gavin wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hi, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > It doesn't look like there's an ebuild for xscreensaver... Where |
| 7 |
> > should I put it if I make one? I was thinking either x11-base or |
| 8 |
> > app-misc, since nothing else seems appropriate. Maybe we should make |
| 9 |
> > an x11-apps category? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hello, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> x11-base gets my vote; x11-apps would end up containing a lot of things, |
| 15 |
> and I think it is a good thing to have them indexed (as they currently |
| 16 |
> are) by what they do, not how they appear. Otherwise we would have to |
| 17 |
> have an console-apps category ;) and some applications can use both... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
I agree with tom about x11/console apps. So my vote goes to app-misc. |
| 20 |
I'm thinking about removing x11-base and creating a new category that |
| 21 |
can keep xfree, qt-embedded and gtk-embedded ( can I get it anywhere?). |
| 22 |
I don't know a good name for that right now. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
achim~ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> - Tom |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 29 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 31 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives