| 1 |
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 22:22 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Jul 23, 2012 9:43 PM, "Brian Dolbec" <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:28 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > A lot of things, app-portage/ufed for example, don't support this |
| 8 |
> yet... |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > ufed is on the endanged species list, along with a few other |
| 12 |
> app-portage |
| 13 |
> > utilities. It hasn't been developed or maintained for some time |
| 14 |
> now. If |
| 15 |
> > it is to survive, It'll need someone to step up and update it. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I don't see a bug for this change for ufed. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I can take care of this change in ufed. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > -- |
| 22 |
> > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thank you. Also I believe it does not support /etc/portage/package.use |
| 27 |
as well. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Contact Fuzzyray about any change in ufed's status. He recently started |
| 30 |
a thread in the gentoo-portage-dev list to review the status of packages |
| 31 |
we maintain. Ufed being one without a maintainer/developer. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
Archives