| 1 |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: [Wed Mar 14 2007, 10:02:47AM CDT] |
| 2 |
> In my view, there's one important penalty missing from this code of |
| 3 |
> conduct. Actually, the most important penalty - as a last measure, all |
| 4 |
> input from a person to the project will be denied. What I mean is that |
| 5 |
> for worst offenders, Gentoo must be ready to deny any contribution. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ick. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I should provide a detailed, logical explanation for why I don't like |
| 10 |
this idea, but it's mostly a visceral response for me--it just feels |
| 11 |
wrong. If some dev wants to proxy for Joe AnnoyingPerson so that |
| 12 |
the rest of the community doesn't have to deal with him, then I'm |
| 13 |
going to be perfectly happy with that arrangement. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-g2boojum- |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 18 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 19 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 20 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 21 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives