Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: zmedico@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:14:03
Message-Id: 20130314171415.525323a2@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies by Zac Medico
1 On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:26:04 -0700
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 03/14/2013 02:12 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
5 > >> But my first attempt to do a signed commit has failed:
6 > > Your GPG agent is broken/missing.
7 > >
8 > > zmedico/portage-dev:
9 > > Maybe a good idea to check for agent sanity before trying to use it?
10 >
11 > Yeah, we could have it do a test signature to verify that it's working
12 > properly before it tries to commit anything. We've got this bug filed:
13 >
14 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298605
15
16 If that means doing an additional signature every time something is
17 going to be committed, that sounds like an overkill. If we were to do
18 something radical, I'd rather be in favor of disabling keyword
19 expansion completely and finally being able to do sane commits.
20
21 --
22 Best regards,
23 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>