Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:30:31
Message-Id: 5141FB1B.1090004@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies by "Michał Górny"
1 On 03/14/2013 09:14 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:26:04 -0700
3 > Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On 03/14/2013 02:12 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
6 >>>> But my first attempt to do a signed commit has failed:
7 >>> Your GPG agent is broken/missing.
8 >>>
9 >>> zmedico/portage-dev:
10 >>> Maybe a good idea to check for agent sanity before trying to use it?
11 >>
12 >> Yeah, we could have it do a test signature to verify that it's working
13 >> properly before it tries to commit anything. We've got this bug filed:
14 >>
15 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298605
16 >
17 > If that means doing an additional signature every time something is
18 > going to be committed, that sounds like an overkill. If we were to do
19 > something radical, I'd rather be in favor of disabling keyword
20 > expansion completely and finally being able to do sane commits.
21
22 We could do that if we simply add all files using the cvs -kb option.
23 However, Fabian has requested that we keep the keywords for the purposes
24 of his prefix tree merging script:
25
26 http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg55238.html
27 --
28 Thanks,
29 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>